Could there be more errors, besides there would be no HIV virus?

Yes, there maybe more errors, besides there would be no HIV virus.


The probably absence of HIV could be the tip of an iceberg, or to be simply another mistake of many occurred in the medical field.

In this sense there are several possibilities, with various theories, that say:

- no one has shown the existence of HIV retrovirus (mainly defended by the Perth Group)

- no one has shown the existence of any retrovirus

- no one has shown the existence of any virus

- no one has shown certain bacteria are pathogenic


I have no opinion, for the moment, about what statement could be correct. I have to study a lot more this issue in order to have an intuition about it (please, click the tab "Forum" above to see my progression). But, in any case, I think the Perth Group will continue being right demanding that certain necessary conditions be fulfilled to prove the existence of HIV.